Legal Opinion
Bousquet v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 14, 1977No. CR76-224PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
Mary Bousquet has appealed from her conviction of disorderly conduct and of interference with a law enforcement officer. She asserts one ground for reversal on each conviction. She contends that Árk. Stat. Ann. § 41-2908 (Grim. Code, 1976) defining disorderly conduct is unconstitutional as applied to her and that there is no factual support for finding her guilty of interference with a law enforcement officer. We disagree on both points and affirm.
Appellant was found guilty of violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-2908 (l)(c). The pertinent part of the statute defining…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Lewis v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mathews v. CintronSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hilliard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Lucas Et Al. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- State v. AutheletSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- State v. AutheletSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Fauna v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.