Legal Opinion
State v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 19, 2010No. 62142-4-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.
¶1 In an unpublished opinion, we rejected Roger Sinclair Wright’s argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the officer lacked justification to stop him for a traffic infraction or that the traffic stop was a pretext, and affirmed his convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and possession of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA a/k/a “Ecstasy”).1 Wright filed a motion to reconsider based on the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. Gant, _ U.S. _ , 129 S. Ct. 1710, 173 L. Ed. 2d 485 (2009). Wright contends that…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SnappWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SwetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. SwetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Commonwealth v. LongMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2020
- State v. SnappWashington Supreme Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.