Lewis v. Vermont American Corp.

This is an appeal by plaintiff Gay Lewis from judgment after a jury verdict denying his product liability claim against defendant Vermont American Corporation. We affirm.

In his five points relied on, Lewis contends the trial court erred: (1) in admitting evidence of Lewis’ failure to wear safety glasses because (a) no evidence was presented to support a preliminary finding that safety glasses would have prevented or lessened the injury, or that Lewis knew they would have prevented or lessened his eye injury and (b) Vermont American did not establish that Lewis’ failure to wear safety glasses…