Legal Opinion

Pinkus & Sons v. Olcheski

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided April 22, 1936No. 937Published

1Opinion of the Court

Leach, P. J.,

The plaintiff’s title in replevin arose from a landlord’s sale. In such case he must show affirmatively that all the statutory requirements of said sale had been complied with: Peerless Soda Fountain Service Co. v. Walsh et al., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 71, and cases there cited. Part of the statutory requirements is that the goods and chattels shall be appraised by two reputable freeholders. One of the appraisers was an owner of land by entireties with his wife. The trial judge followed certain decisions wherein the term is defined under the Act of March 20, 1725, 1 Sm. L. 164,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peerless Soda Fountain Serv. Co. v. WalshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. FollettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API