Legal Opinion

State v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Doeiífler, J.

The claimant, Johnson, sustained his injuries at Camp Douglas, while at target practice, as a member of the National Guard of Wisconsin.

The position taken by the attorney general is that the National Guard of Wisconsin is a part of the federal army, and not an organization of the state militia, and that consequently, being a federal employee, he is not entitled to compensation from the state under the workmen’s compensation act. On the other hand, counsel for the defendants contend that claimant at the time of receiving his injuries was a member of the National Guard; that such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nebraska National Guard v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bianco v. AustinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  3. Chapman v. Belden Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Lind v. Nebraska National GuardNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  5. United States v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API