Legal Opinion

United States v. Chikaka

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided June 20, 2017No. 16-0586/MCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge OHLSON

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We granted review to determine whether the lower court erred in concluding that Appellant’s claim of unlawful command influence (UCI) was “without merit.” 1 United States v. Chikaka, 76 M.J. 40, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2016). For the reasons set forth below, we hold that Appellant presented sufficient evidence of UCI during the sentencing phase of his court-martial to cause the burden to shift to the Government to disprove UCI beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. McClourCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  3. United States v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  4. United States v. CherryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. ChikakaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019
  2. United States v. GoodellU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  3. United States v. JerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
  4. United States v. Sergeant ERIC F. KELLYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  5. United States v. Sergeant MALIK J. SHAKURArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API