Legal Opinion

Holmes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 29, 1998No. 96-4522PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonald, PARKER LEE, Senior Judge.

In this direct appeal, the only dispositive issue worthy of comment is whether the trial court’s deviation from the standard deadlock charge, Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.06, amounted to fundamental error requiring reversal of appellant’s conviction. We affirm because we agree with the state that while the deadlock charge given may have been inadequate, it was not so egregious as to amount to fundamental error, requiring reversal in the absence of any challenge below.

At trial, the jury deliberations began at 2:13 p.m., and at some point…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Gahley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Warren v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Scoggins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roma v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API