Legal Opinion

Prostak v. Prostak

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 11, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

257 N.J. Super. 75 (1992)

607 A.2d 1349

HELEN PROSTAK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT,

v.

JOHN AND SOPHIE PROSTAK, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS/CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 18, 1991.

Decided June 11, 1992.

Before Judges PETRELLA,[1] R.S. COHEN and ARNOLD M. STEIN.

Robert F. Danziger argued the cause for appellants/cross-respondents (Large, Scammell & Danziger, attorneys; Robert F. Danziger on the brief).

Robert I. Kuchinsky argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Robert I. Kuchinsky, P.A., attorney; Robert I. Kuchinsky on the brief).

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. STATE, HIGHWAY COMM'R v. GorgaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Fusco v. FuscoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. County of Essex v. WaldmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
  5. Ierrobino v. MegaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PyattNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  2. Miles v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2006
  3. Britton v. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API