Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Brown
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 11, 2013No. Nos. 2:90-cv-0520 LKK JFM P, C01-1351 TEHPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO VACATE OR MODIFY POPULATION REDUCTION ORDER
On January 7, 2013, defendants filed a Motion to Vacate or Modify Population Reduction Order. Defs.’ Mot. to Vacate or Modify Population Reduction Order (ECF No. 2506/4280) (“Three-Judge Motion”).1 Defendants contend that a significant and unanticipated change in facts renders inequitable our June 30, 2011 Population Reduction Order (amended as of January 29, 2013) (“Order”). They request a complete vacatur of our Order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5). On January 29, 2013, this Court…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- David Pride, Jr. v. M. CorreaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Hernandez v. County of MontereyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- In re IlasaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Robert Griffin v. James GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- (PC) Coleman v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.