Legal Opinion
Trinidad Corp. v. S.S. Keiyoh Maru
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 25, 1988No. 86-5612PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
Sol Gloriosa Marítima, S.A. (“Gloriosa”) and the M.T. KEIYOH MARU (“KEIYOH MARU”) appeal a judgment for Trinidad Corporation (“Trinidad”) and the S.S. FORT WORTH in this maritime collision case. The district court found the KEI-YOH MARU entirely at fault for the accident. Appellants claim that the district court’s ruling was unsupported by substantial evidence, incorrectly determined the applicable rules of navigation governing the maneuvers of the KEIYOH MARU, incorrectly applied the rule of The Pennsylvania, 86 U.S. (19 Wall.) 125, 22 L.Ed. 148 (1878), concerning the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- The City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Waring v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Exxon Co. v. Sofec, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Stephen P. Havens v. F/t Polar Mist, U.S.C.G. Official Number 604676, in Rem, Arctic Vessel Management, Inc., in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Michael P. Maxwell v. Hapag-Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft, HamburgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Ching Sheng Fishery Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- C-Art, Ltd. v. Hong Kong Islands Line America, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.