Legal Opinion
Matthew James Hollis v. Joshua Thomas Patton, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 27, 2026No. 2:26-cv-01658Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 MATTHEW JAMES HOLLIS, No. 2:26-cv-01658-DJC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. ORDER 15 JOSHUA THOMAS PATTON, et al., 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 21 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to stay 22 (ECF No. 93), which seeks to stay proceedings in this Court pending resolution of his petition for 23 writ of mandamus before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (9th Cir.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Hoeun Yong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.