Legal Opinion

Von Lusch v. C & P Telephone Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 20, 1978No. Civ. Y-75-1137PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.

The defendants, Eugene Grannan, Julius Grollman and the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company (hereafter C&P) have filed motions for summary judgment on the remaining causes of action pending against them. The plaintiffs, Richard and Marie Von Lusch, have opposed the defendants’ motions and have themselves requested summary judgment. The pending claims are under [42 U.S.C.A.] § 1983 and state law against all the defendants and under 47 U.S.C. §§ 202 and 605 against C&P.

The genesis of the dispute between the parties was the construction of the Bay Bridge…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Thillens, Inc. v. Community Currency Exchange Ass'n of Illinois, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  3. State v. NeelyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Provenza v. RinaudoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  5. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API