Legal Opinion

State v. Mead

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 14, 2012No. 2010-414PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. Defendant was convicted of attempted second-degree murder following a jury trial. He appeals that conviction on four grounds: (1) a State’s witness and a juror had improper contact during trial; (2) the trial court admitted excerpts of defendant’s testimony at a relief-from-abuse (RFA) hearing at which defendant was not represented by counsel; (3) the trial court admitted evidence of prior bad acts of defendant; and (4) the jury charge did not require the jury to identify which gunshot supported its conviction. We affirm.

¶ 2. The facts, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Parker v. GladdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. State v. OscarsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. State v. YohSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Jeffrey M. RaySupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
  2. Eugene W. Beaudoin, Derivatively on Behalf of The New England Expedition Ltd. Partnership II & IV v. Barry E. Feldman, The New England Expedition-Colchester LLC and Colchester Managing Member Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. Labate v. Rutland Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. State v. Jeremy LambertSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  5. State v. Loren KandziorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API