Thorndyke v. Alaska Perseverance Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). From the pleadings of the parties we think it clear that no question of riparian rights arises in the case, all of them basing their alleged rights on their alleged respective appropriations of the public waters for mining, and other purposes connected therewith.
The exhibits and other evidence in the case show that Silver Bow Basin is a small pocket surrounded by high mountains, upon some of which are located the defendant’s lode mining claims — its mill, mill sites, buildings, and other improvements of that character being situated in the basin. Above the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Furrer v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- North American Exploration Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tobey v. KilbourneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Anderson v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1913