Legal Opinion
Smith v. Walsh
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 7, 1981No. Civ. H-80-844PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BLUMENFELD, Senior District Judge.
In this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 the plaintiff seeks damages for the decision of the Connecticut Real Estate Commission to deny his application for a real estate license because he was a minor. Plaintiff claims that the decision denied him his rights under the fourteenth amendment to due process and equal protection. The plaintiffs also make a pendent claim based on Carl’s alleged “unalienable right to work” under the Connecticut Constitution. The plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Puglisi v. Underhill Park Taxpayer Assoc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- McAdoo v. LaneDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Rivera v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Barletta v. RillingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Conrad v. PeralesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.