Legal Opinion

Darby v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1987No. Nos. 86-1143, 86-1144 and 86-1794PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants filed motions to suppress and dismiss the information filed against them on the grounds that the arresting officers were acting outside their territorial jurisdiction. Appellants pled nolo contendere, reserving the right to appeal the denial of their motions to dismiss. The validity of an arrest has no bearing on the guilt or innocence of an accused and is not necessary to the jurisdiction of a court in a criminal case. The invalidity of a given arrest, even if establishable, may not suffice to defeat a prosecution where there is sufficient evidence of the offense independent of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Perry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. State v. PinoamadorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PhelpsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Conley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. State v. FilosoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. State v. OstrowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API