Legal Opinion
Vito v. Sargis & Jones, Ltd.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 29, 1996No. 596, Sept. Term, 1995Published
1Opinion of the Court
672 A.2d 129 (1996)
108 Md. App. 408
Mary Alice VITO
v.
SARGIS & JONES, LTD. et al.
No. 596, Sept. Term, 1995.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.
February 29, 1996.
Monroe Jon Mizel, Kingsington, for appellant.
Thomas Patrick Ryan (McCarthy, Wilson & Ethridge, on the brief), Rockville, for appellee, Sargis & Jones.
Denise A. Greig (Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellee, Cogan Kibler, Inc.
Argued before HOLLANDER and SALMON, JJ., and PAUL E. ALPERT, Judge (Retired), Specially Assigned.
SALMON, Judge.
In this appeal we are called upon to analyze the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Benedick v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Cheney v. Bell National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.