Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 8, 1971No. 55825PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

Ervin C. Thompson has appealed from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of uttering a forged instrument and assessing punishment at confinement in the county jail for 6 months and a fine of $250.

Appellant’s first point challenges the jurisdiction of the circuit court on the ground that in compliance with Criminal Rule 30.12 V.A.M.R. accused filed an affidavit to disqualify the regular judge but the judge overruled the affidavit and proceeded to try the case. The rule provides that “The judge shall be disqualified under the provisions of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. State v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. State v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  4. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  5. State v. HaileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State v. WeekleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  3. State v. BosticSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. Mountjoy v. BonackerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API