Legal Opinion

Elsasser v. Elsasser

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1999No. 99-12PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

At issue in this case is whether the trial court had the authority to issue a Decree of Divorce Nunc Pro Tunc which added a provision to the original decree regarding the calculation of Kathy Elsasser’s (Wife’s) share of Michael Elsasser’s (Husband’s) retirement benefits. We find that the district court’s order was a proper clarification of the earlier decree and affirm.

ISSUE

The parties present a single issue for review:

Did the trial court have the authority to amend the Decree of Divorce?

FACTS

After a marriage of 28 years, the parties divorced on June 24,1994. Incorporated into…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Broadhead v. BroadheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Arnold v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Spomer v. SpomerWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Matter of Estate of KimballWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Eddy v. First Wyoming Bank, N.A.-LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Meckem v. CarterWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Glover v. CraykWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Moore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Chesapeake Exploration, Llc, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company v. Morton Production Company, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Josh Van Vlack v. Emma Van VlackWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API