Legal Opinion

Moriconi v. Flemming

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1954No. Civ. 15697PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

All of the defendants appeal from a judg ment rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The action was commenced against defendant Flemming to recover on two promissory notes given by Flemming to plaintiff. N. H. Development Company and Newton, its president, intervened and filed an answer and cross-complaint.

The indebtedness here sued upon is the culmination of a series of transactions, commencing in 1944, in which plaintiff gave defendant Flemming various sums of money which were in turn loaned to N. EL Development Company and Newton on promissory notes given in the earlier transactions to one…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Sayre v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Oakland Medical Building Corp. v. AureguyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Montgomery v. RiessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API