Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Hazard

New York Court of Chancery

Decided March 3, 1814PublishedCited by 6 opinions

THE bill, which was for a ne exeat, and sworn to, March 3, 1814, stated, that the defendant, on the 22d of October, 1813, purchased of the plaintiff a house and lot of ground in Hillsdale, for 3,300 dollars, and for which he gave the plaintiff seven promissory notes, and a mortgage on the premises to secure the payment; that possession of the premises was immediately given to the defendant; that one of the notes would become due on the 15 th of April next; that on the 20th…

Read the full summary

THE bill, which was for a ne exeat, and sworn to, March 3, 1814, stated, that the defendant, on the 22d of October, 1813, purchased of the plaintiff a house and lot of ground in Hillsdale, for 3,300 dollars, and for which he gave the plaintiff seven promissory notes, and a mortgage on the premises to secure the payment; that possession of the premises was immediately given to the defendant; that one of the notes would become due on the 15 th of April next; that on the 20th of January last, the defendant clandestinely left the premises, having pnt another person, a poor man, in possession ;…

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The writ of ne exeat cannot be granted for a debt due and recoverable at law. As a general rule, it is applicable only to equitable demands. (Dicken’s Rep. 82. 154. 503. 609. Amb. 75. 2 Atk. 210. 10 Vesey, jun. 165.)

This objection applies equally to the debt of thirty dollars as to the demand on the notes; and there is a further objection to granting the writ, as it respects the notes, that none of them appear to be due; and there must be not only an equitable demand, but one in the nature of a debt actually due. (Cook v. Ravie, 6 Vesey, jun. 283.) (a)

Vide Shaftoe v. Shaftoe,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adams v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1874
  2. Rhodes v. CousinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1828
  3. Brokaw v. FairchildNew York Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Rhodes v. CousinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1828
  5. Rhodes v. CousinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1828

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API