Legal Opinion

White v. Redevelopment Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1980No. Appeal, No. 2319 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Julian W. Panek and Mary Panek (Appellants) operated a florist business in a leased premises located at 417 Ringgold Street in McKeesport for about seven years. In 1973, the Redevelopment Authority of the City of McKeesport (Authority) condemned that premises; as a consequence Appellants moved their business in May of 1973 to 519 Walnut Street, *329McKeesport. Appellants then sought relocation damages from the Authority pursuant to the provisions of Section 601A of the Eminent Domain Code, Act of June 22,1964, P.L. 84, Special Sess., added by Section 8 of the Act of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neuman v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API