Legal Opinion
Belflower v. CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF FLA.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 5, 1987No. 87-790PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
510 So.2d 1130 (1987)
Randall BELFLOWER, Appellant,
v.
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.
No. 87-790.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
August 5, 1987.
David B. McEwen of Dyches and McEwen, Tampa, for appellant.
Lee D. Gunn, IV of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.
2Per curiam
The appellant, Randall Belflower, seeks review of a judgment in which the trial court determined Belflower was liable by way of default to the appellee, Cushman & Wakefield of Florida, Inc. (Cushman). We reverse.
Cushman, a real estate brokerage firm,…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Mercer v. RaineSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Sunstream Jet Center, Inc. v. Lisa Leasing Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Austin v. PapolDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
4Cited by4 opinions
- Martin v. Laidlaw Tree Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Franchi v. ShapiroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Sizemore v. Ray Gunter Trucking, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Ross v. City of Tarpon SpringsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001