Legal Opinion
Haemonetics Corp. v. Brophy & Phillips Co.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided December 16, 1986PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
Haemonetics Corporation owns and occupies a building in Braintree which it uses in its business of manufac turing and selling medical products. In 1980, Haemonetics contracted for the construction of a mezzanine in the building with Brophy & Phillips Company, Inc. (general contractor). The general contractor in turn subcontracted for the steel construction portion of the work on the project with A & C Steel Erectors, Inc. (subcontractor). While the subcontractor was engaged in electric arc welding on the project, a fire occurred on the owner’s premises causing damage to its real and personal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tokio Marine And Fire Insurance Company Limited v. Employers Insurance Of WausauCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- E. C. Long, Inc. v. Brennan's of Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Fortin v. Nebel Heating Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
3Cited by41 opinions
- Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Bituminous Casualty CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. A.C.C.T., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- S.S.D.W. Co. v. Brisk Waterproofing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Bill Cox Construction, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. Entrex Communication Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.