Legal Opinion
Brody v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 5, 1976No. Claim No. 54636PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: It is well settled that the validity of an appropriation award and its various components must be either within the range of testimony or supported by other evidence (Matter of City of New York [A. & W. Realty Corp.], 1 NY2d 428) and sufficiently explained by the court (Flynn v State of New York, 35 AD2d 640; Deutsch v State of New York, 32 AD2d 599, mot for lv to app den 25 NY2d 739; Tremarco Corp. v State of New York, 30 AD2d 1019; Spyros v State of New York, 25 AD2d 696). It has also been held that the explanation contemplated by these rules is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mtr. of City of Ny (A. & W. Realty Corp.)New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Spyros v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Camp Bel-Aire, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Flynn v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- Deutsch v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zittel v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978