Legal Opinion

Haycraft v. Davis

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jersey county; the Hon. Charles D. Hodges, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Breese

This was an action of detinue for a promissory note made by James Brown, brought to the Jersey Circuit Court by Benjamin F. Davis, the payee, against James J. Haycraft, and tried by a jury on the general issue and several special pleas. The issues were found for the plaintiff, and the usual j udgment was entered, that defendant deliver up the note or pay the plaintiff the value thereof, which was found by the jury to be $1,112.07, a motion for a new trial having been denied.

To reverse this judgment the defendant appeals to this court, making the point that the verdict was contrary to the law…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frizell v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Wallace v. WrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rice Foundation v. RiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. West Chicago St. R. R. v. ByrneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  3. Cicero & Proviso Street Railway Co. v. HughesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API