Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Deangelis

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 6, 1966No. 15632_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The only question before us is what were the effective sentences imposed upon defendant-appellant. Whatever confusion there may have been regarding this, and it is more apparent than real, is best clarified by stating the sentencing process.

The defendant pleaded guilty to counts 2, 14 and 15 of a 19 count indictment. Those counts charged defendant with three separate offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 2314, transportation of a forged warehouse receipt in interstate commerce. Each of those offenses had a maximum penalty of ten years imprisonment. Defendant also pleaded guilty to count 1 of an…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. MILBANK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. KluverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. In the Matter of American Express Warehousing, Ltd., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Prager v. American Broadcasting Cos., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
  4. Heimann v. American Express Co.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Anthony Deangelis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API