Legal Opinion

People v. Batista

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1988No. B023267PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON, Acting P. J

Introduction

After pleading guilty to first degree burglary in violation of Penal Code section 459, 1 defendant Robert Batista waived his right to a jury trial on the allegation that he was convicted of a prior residential burglary. The trial court found that allegation true, and sentenced defendant to the midterm of four years on the burglary charge and to an additional five years as a prior conviction enhancement. Batista appeals the judgment of conviction and the imposition of the enhancement.

In our opinion filed October 2, 1987, we affirmed the judgment of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. AlfaroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. WarburtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. People v. AbarcaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API