MATTER OF BEATTY v. Owens
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Jasen and Jones, JJ.
(dissenting memorandum). The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. We believe we are bound by the affirmed finding of fact at the Appellate Division that' the primary election was so permeated by fraud and irregularities “as to render it impossible to determine who was rightfully nominated.” Where there was such a breakdown in the election process as the courts below found occurred here, a new primary election should be held to determine the rightful Democratic candidate for the important office of Member of the House of Representatives (see Matter of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lowenstein v. LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1972