Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Ortega

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 2011No. 417PA10PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Justice.

In this appeal we consider whether evidence contained in juror affidavits is admissible to support plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in her medical malpractice case. Because we hold that these statements are inadmissible pursuant to Rule 606(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence, we reverse.

On 18 May 2005, plaintiff Penny Cummings filed a medical malpractice action against defendants in the Superior Court, Harnett County. In her complaint, plaintiff alleged that she suffered personal injuries during a diagnostic laparoscopy performed by defendant Agnes Ortega, M.D. At…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Greene v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  2. State v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020
  3. State v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API