Universal Oil Products Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.

MORRIS, District Judge.

After the handing down of the opinion in this case (20 F. [2d] 995), and before entry of decree, the defendant moved to reopen, that further testimony, newly discovered, might be adduced by the defendant, and for reargument. An , examination of the testimony proposed to he offered convinces me that it is not of a character that would warrant the reopening of the case at this stage. It is neither controlling nor so persuasive as imv terially to affect any issue.

*112The briefs in support of the motion for reargument point out some false reasoning and erroneous conclusions…