Legal Opinion

Prudential Loan Co. v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1935Published

1Opinion

Petition for rehearing denied April 9, 1935

On Petition for Rehearing

(42 P. (2d) 919)

KELLY, J.

In a petition for rehearing, appealing defendant contends that this court erred in dismissing his appeal.

One position he assumes is that the decree of the circuit court is void and that there can be no parties to an invalid or void judgment, there can be neither judgment creditors nor judgment debtors in such a case.

There are two defects in this argument. One is that, prima facie, the decree in the case at bar is a valid decree. By its order overruling defendant’s motion to vacate it on the ground…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Finch v. Pacific Reduction & Chemical Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Western Pattern & Manufacturing Co. v. American Metal Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. May v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Prudential Loan Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API