Legal Opinion

Bednarik v. United Steelworkers of America

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 14, 1985No. C80-596-YPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This case is now before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation (the “Company”) and the Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment of defendant United Steelworkers of America (The “Union”).

This action was originally instituted when plaintiff, a class 16 millwright, filed a suit against Youngstown Sheet and Tube1 pursuant to Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (“Section 301”) for having selected instead of plaintiff a slightly more…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robert Fitzke and Joy Fitzke v. Barry Shappell, Deputy Sheriff, and Elwin Smith, Sheriff, of Eaton County, Michigan, Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  2. Mary Granger v. Alfred Marek, Gerald Kobey, Larry Griffith, Burton RothCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge No. 1194 v. Garwood Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1922 v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1922 v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API