Legal Opinion

Ex parte Asit Ranjan Ghosh

District Court, S.D. California

Decided November 16, 1944No. Civil Action No. 3927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, District Judge.

The facts1 and applicable laws being still fresh in everyone’s mind from the argument makes it superfluous to review them in these comments. Nor will the *853brevity of these comments permit any extended analysis of the law or various regulations. I will very briefly and informally state the grounds of my decision.

I think a writ should be granted. I do not believe that any Of the points which the government has raised are sufficient to show that this man did have due process. I believe he was denied due process. I think the action of the local board was arbitrary and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. ThindSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kristensen v. McGrath Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  2. United States v. LeichtfussDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
  3. Benzian v. GodwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  4. Giz v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  5. Robert Allan Mang v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API