Legal Opinion

Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. Debritto

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1990No. 89-CA-1105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Defendants, Earl and Herma Edwards, appeal the trial court’s granting of plaintiff, Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation’s (“FSLIC”), motion for summary judgment, finding that there was no genuine issue as to material fact and that the defendants had defaulted on a promissory note, owing $13,485.75. We reverse and remand to the trial court.

On January 6, 1984, the defendants executed a promissory note payable to New Orleans Federal Savings and Loan Association (“NOF”) in the amount of $26,503.68, payable in monthly installments of $315.52. That same day defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Equipment, Inc. v. Anderson Petroleum, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. White v. Gulf States UtilitiesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Johnson v. Ouachita Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Brinkley v. Murrell Enterprises, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Succession of GaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guillory v. Dr. XLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. FSLIC v. EdwardsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. In Re: Medical Review Complaint by Daron Downing, Andrus Downing, Andria Downing, and Andre Downing for Melissa Downing (D) .Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. Whitney National Bank v. BuchlerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API