Legal Opinion
Narragansett Indian Tribe v. Pollack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 23, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2022-2299Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NARRAGANSETT INDIAN TRIBE, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 22-2299 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 42, 43 : SHAILEN BHATT, Administrator, : Federal Highway Administration, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S CROSS- MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I. INTRODUCTION The Narragansett Indian Tribe, acting by and through the Narragansett Indian Tribal Historic Preservation Office (the “Tribe”), brings this action against Shailen Bhatt, in his official capacity as Administrator…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Florida Audubon Society v. Lloyd M. Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and Margaret Richardson, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.