Legal Opinion

Landfield Finance Co. v. Feinerman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 6, 1972No. 54683PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dempsey

The Landfield Finance Company filed suit against Albert and Lula Feinerman, alleging that they converted items of personal property in which the plaintiff had a prior and perfected security interest. Following a trial without a jury the court found for Landfield and entered judgment in tire sum of $4,115.63, from which the defendants appeal. They contend that Landfield failed to prove that a conversion had taken place and that the testimony of the company’s president, concerning the market value of the collateral, should have been excluded.

In 1955 the Feinermans entered into an agreement with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thuma v. Granada Hotel Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1933
  2. Genslinger v. New Illinois Athletic ClubAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  3. Adams v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Associates Discount Corp. v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  5. Chapman v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Douglass v. WonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Pillsbury Co. v. Midland Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1989
  4. Porter v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. In Re ReevesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API