Legal Opinion

Cahoon v. Board of Commissioners of Hyde County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBbogdem, J.

“It is well settled that in an action of this kind this Court can review the evidence and determine questions of fact as well as of law, but there is a presumption that the proceedings in the court below are correct, and the appellant must show error.” Parker v. Debnam, 195 N. C., 56, 141 S. E., 535; Castle v. Threadgill, 203 N. C., 441, 166 S. E., 313; Shelly v. Grainger, 204 N. C., 488, 168 S. E., 736.

There was evidence to- support the findings of fact made by the trial judge. Moreover, it has been made to appear to the court that $10,000 of the sum involved in the proceeding has already…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. Cooper Monument Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Rousseau v. . BullisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Shelly v. . GraingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Shelly v. GraingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Castle v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cauble v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API