Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2003PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated April 18, 2002, as granted the plaintiff wife pendente lite maintenance in the sum of $1,700 per week and a pendente lite counsel fee in the sum of $10,000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the husband’s contention, the Supreme Court set forth in sufficient detail the factors it considered in making its pendente lite award. Generally, a speedy trial is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campanaro v. CampanaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Bagner v. BagnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Wallach v. WallachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Menashi v. MenashiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fruchter v. FruchterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Bogannam v. BogannamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. DeVerna v. DeVernaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Najac v. NajacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Iwanow v. IwanowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API