Legal Opinion

Household Finance Corp. v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1967No. 38666PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J. —

July 17, 1963, the defendants, Timothy M. Smith and Mary M. Smith, his wife, while residents of South Dakota, for value received, executed and delivered to the plaintiff, Household Finance Corporation of Sioux Falls, a corporation, their promissory note whereby they made a promise to pay “jointly and severally” the sum of $816. It was agreed, as part of the note, that:

The construction, validity and effect hereof shall be governed by the laws of South Dakota.

Thereafter, the defendants became residents of Washington, and on June 10, 1965, the plaintiff obtained a default judgment in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bortle v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Dennis J. Britt, Trustee of Frank James Damson, Bankrupt v. Alice J. DamsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Granger v. RollSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  4. La Selle v. WooleryWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Escrow Service Co. v. CresslerWashington Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. deElche v. JacobsenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Keene v. EdieWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  4. Pacific States Cut Stone Co. v. GobleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Vasey v. Snohomish CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API