Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Printup Bros. & Pollard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Promissory Notes. Failure of Consideración. Pleadings. Before W. M. Reese, Esq., Judge pro hac vice. Columbia Superior Court. March Term, 1883. In addition to the report contained in tbe decision, it is' only necessary to state that each of the first two notes stated its consideration to be £< one 6 EL P. engine, 2d hand, and 1 Smith H. P. cotton pressand the other two stated their consideration to be a cotton gin.

Read the full summary

Promissory Notes. Failure of Consideración. Pleadings. Before W. M. Reese, Esq., Judge pro hac vice. Columbia Superior Court. March Term, 1883. In addition to the report contained in tbe decision, it is' only necessary to state that each of the first two notes stated its consideration to be £< one 6 EL P. engine, 2d hand, and 1 Smith H. P. cotton pressand the other two stated their consideration to be a cotton gin. The plea of failure of consideration, filed by Morgan, was as follows : “Defendant says the consideration for which the note for the one 6 H. P. Scofield engine was given has…

1Opinion of the Court

Blandeord, Justice.

■ 1. The defendants in error sued plaintiffs in error on four promissory notes, two for the expressed consideration of one steam engine and one cotton press, two for expressed consideration of one cotton gin. Defendant pleaded that the-consideration of the notes for' the steam engine has entirely failed, etc.; and the consideration of the gin notes-*68has failed, because the gin was represented as a good gin, when, on the contrary, the ribs of the gin were made of inferior soft metal, and wore out the first season, etc.

The court charged the jury, inter alia: ‘As to the «agine,…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Coast Scopitone, Inc. v. SelfCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Clegg-Ray Co v. Indiana Scale & Truck Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Imex International, Inc. v. Wires EngineeringCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Consolidated Phosphate Co. v. Sturtevant Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Otis Bros. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API