Legal Opinion
Lambries v. Saluda County Council
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided June 13, 2012No. 4989PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKonduros, J.
Dennis Lambries appeals the circuit court’s ruling that the amendment of the agenda by the Saluda County Council (the Council) during its meetings does not violate the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). We reverse.
FACTS
Lambries filed suit against the Council contending its practice of amending its agenda during regularly scheduled meetings violated FOIA. The circuit court concluded specific language in section 30-4-80 of the South Carolina Code (2007) indicated no agenda was required for regularly scheduled meetings and the amendments to the agenda were made in open public sessions in…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Hopper v. Terry Hunt ConstructionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- New York Times Co. v. Spartanburg County School District No. 7Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
- Pressley v. REA Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lambries v. Saluda County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Brock v. Town of Mount PleasantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
- Atkins v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016