Legal Opinion

Merritt v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 23, 1992No. 91SC597PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

We granted certiorari to determine whether, under the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution, the district court correctly refused to allow cross-examination of the prosecution’s two essential witnesses concerning the fact that the court, at the prosecutor’s request, had granted immunity to the witnesses requiring them to testify after each had asserted his Fifth Amendment right to refuse to testify. The court of appeals stated that “to allow such cross-examination would, in our view, have been proper,” but it affirmed the trial court because it deemed the evidence to have…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. People v. FrySupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Blecha v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Vega v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Key v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API