Legal Opinion

State v. Schuster

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 10, 1955No. 44434PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of forcible rape. Section 559.260, RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. His punishment was assessed by a jury at two years in the penitentiary; and he has appealed from the judgment entered.

Herein defendant-appellant contends the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal; in giving State’s Instruction No. 3; and in failing to properly rule on defendant’s objection to a statement made by the prosecuting attorney in his argument to the jury. Defendant-appellant also asserts the prosecuting attorney, when…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SpinksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  3. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. State v. CatronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. State v. BeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. State v. KnightonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. State v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API