State v. Schuster
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OSDOL, Commissioner.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of forcible rape. Section 559.260, RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. His punishment was assessed by a jury at two years in the penitentiary; and he has appealed from the judgment entered.
Herein defendant-appellant contends the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal; in giving State’s Instruction No. 3; and in failing to properly rule on defendant’s objection to a statement made by the prosecuting attorney in his argument to the jury. Defendant-appellant also asserts the prosecuting attorney, when…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SpinksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- State v. CatronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- State v. BeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State v. KnightonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.