Legal Opinion

Snelten v. Schmidt Implement Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 13, 1995No. 2-94-0776PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hutchinson

Plaintiff, Donald Snelten, appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his complaint with prejudice. In his amended two-count complaint, Snelten alleged defendant, Schmidt Implement Company, was negligent in that it failed to inspect properly, observe, or discover that the used tractor it sold to plaintiff had been altered in a manner which bypassed the neutral safety switch. Plaintiff alleged he was hurt as a result of that alteration because plaintiff started the tractor while it was in gear and it ran over him, fracturing his pelvis. The second count of the complaint alleged negligent…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Echo, Inc. v. Whitson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Prime Leasing, Inc. v. KendigAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Henderson v. Roadway ExpressAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Lincoln Logan Mutual Insurance v. FornshellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. AAR International, Inc. v. Vacances Heliades S.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API