Legal Opinion
Nye v. Katsilometes
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 26, 2019No. Docket 45917PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. NATURE OF THE CASE
In an appeal arising out of Bannock County, Tom Katsilometes challenges the Idaho Senate's order granting over $18,000 in attorney fees to Senator W. Marcus W. Nye, awarded after Nye prevailed against Katsilometes in a contest over the results of the 2016 general election. The Senate confirmed Nye's election and awarded him costs and attorney fees. Because Katsilometes refused to pay the attorney fees, Nye brought an action in district court seeking a declaratory judgment ordering Katsilometes to pay him the amount ordered by the Senate. The district court granted the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Barry v. United States Ex Rel. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Smith v. MittonIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ZarinegarIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Ellis v. EllisIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Alcala v. Verbruggen Palletizing Solutions, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Bedke v. EllsworthIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- Hooley v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.