Legal Opinion

Foote v. Dunagan

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 6, 1994No. Nos. 92-6522, 92-6523PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judge K.K. HALL and Senior Judge HIRAM H. WARD joined.

OPINION

LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:

Appellant/eross-appellee Ira T. Foote, Jr., instituted an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 following his arrest in April 1988, alleging a plethora of claims against eleven defendants. The district court dismissed all but four of Foote’s claims and, adopting a magistrate-judge’s report and recommendation, held for Foote on his claim that Deputy Sheriff Keith Dunagan used excessive force during his initial stop of Foote. The district court,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Sewn NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Baker v. Monroe TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Albert Lee Purcell, Shon PurcellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Clem v. CorbeauCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  5. Clem v. CorbeauCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API