Dubois v. Hutchinson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. Bepleyin. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Dubois sued Hutchinson in replevin. The writ was directed to the sheriff of Ingham county, and one W. H. McEnally, a deputy, executed it. Hutchinson interposed a plea in abatement, to which Dubois demurred. The court overruled the demurrer and entered judgment *263that the writ should be quashed, and at a subsequent term awarded final judgment for Hutchinson in the sum of $567.39 as the value of' a special lien proved on an assessment under Comp. L., § 6754. Dubois sued out a writ of error.
The theory of the plea in abatement is that when the property was seized by the writ of replevin it was held…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Belden v. LaingMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by4 opinions
- Whitehead v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Whitehead v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Carew v. MatthewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Alter v. City of Cincinnati, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1897