Legal Opinion
FN Herstal, S.A. v. Clyde Armory, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided August 20, 2015No. 3:12-CV-102 (CAR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENCH TRIAL ORDER
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In this trademark infringement case, Plaintiff FN Herstal, S.A. (“FN”) and Defendant Clyde Armory, Inc. (“Clyde Armory”) both claim superior rights to use “SCAR” or “SCAR-Stock” in the firearms industry. The Court conducted a bench trial in this case on July 21-July 23, 2015, and, 'thereafter, directed the parties to, submit their proposed findings and fact and conclusions of law. After considering all the evidence and the applicable law, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. As explained herein,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- The Sports Authority, Inc. v. Prime Hospitality Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Boston Professional Hockey Association, Inc. v. Dallas Cap & Emblem Mfg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Scarves by Vera, Inc. v. Todo Imports Ltd. (Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Guantanamera Cigars Company v. SMCI Holding, IncDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2022
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019