Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Scroggins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 10, 1998No. 1970216Published

1Dissent

I must respectfully dissent from the majority's holding that the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibits the admission of the preliminary-hearing testimony of the State's absent witness, Billy Williams. The application of clear precedent of the Supreme Court of the United States establishes that the testimony of this absent witness is admissible. The State presented sufficient evidence to show that it had made a good faith effort to secure the absent witness for trial, and the witness's preliminary hearing testimony is marked with indicia of trustworthiness.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API